tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7184718389860127472.post9162625875730903325..comments2023-02-08T00:30:35.488+11:00Comments on Morgan's Security Blog: Linux secure?Morgan Storeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10406049887224934659noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7184718389860127472.post-74328684445591913892010-04-27T12:30:15.682+10:002010-04-27T12:30:15.682+10:00I Completely agree rioter, Linux CAN be secure, so...I Completely agree rioter, Linux CAN be secure, so can Windows. A server is only as good as it's admin, my main like for Linux is its flexability and with flexability comes vulnerability.Morgan Storeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10406049887224934659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7184718389860127472.post-34965175456451220512009-12-19T12:15:47.186+11:002009-12-19T12:15:47.186+11:00Linux is far from secure, every NX stack implmenta...Linux is far from secure, every NX stack implmentation has been broken time and time again. Most distro installs allow root logins rather than ship with instructions to use sudo. SSH allowed root login. Not to mention the recent space of null dereference exploits, that allowed SELinux to be switched off; how is that secure.<br /><br />If it wasnt for theo de ratt and his openbsd work, most security conerns in linux would still exist. Take a look at the amount off remote vulns for linux apps and kernel. Compare it to windows 2003 or windows 2008. It actually has tipped the scales. Linux is very insucure and the myth needs to die.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00787539221147480970noreply@blogger.com